Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Magda Muka's avatar

Yikes!

Expand full comment
Whitney's avatar

1/ “Semantic shift” is a thing… words change meaning, better get used to it… or look for a new line of business.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_change

2/ both sides (hamas & the israeli govt) are talking in terms of extreme annihilation which by extension people are referring to as “genocide” maybe not the legal definition but close enough.

3/ the word “Palestine” meaning a name for a country like say the USA has experienced semantic shift because in the way you used the word Palestine - it hasn’t existed since around 1948 when the UN annexed what was Palestine and formed Israel and the Palestinian Territories specifically The West Bank & The Gaza Strip both of which are occupied by Israel.

4/ Just because a group of people has grown in size doesn’t mean that they aren’t the target of extreme violence. Your commentary diminishes both sides and is an exceptionally thin hook to try to hang your argument on.

5/ What pisses me off is very badly drawn arguments couched (there’s a word that also experienced semantic shift) in humour about very serious issues.

Why does it piss me off so much you ask? Because as a journalist words are my actual profession, they matter and they pay very well.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts